The Tonka Report

Real News In A Changing World

Blatant Act Of Treason By Members Of The United States Congress

with 2 comments

August 22, 2010: Anthony Lawson / YouTube via alawson911 – March 27, 2010

It must have been realised that the letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, signed by nearly 300 members of the U.S. Congress, affirming their commitment to Israel, would be widely publicised and fall into the hands of that illegal Apartheid State, so the writing and signing of that letter should be considered an act of treason.

The letter has totally undermined the power of the President of the United States by virtually telling Israel: “It does not matter what you do to the Palestinians, how many illegal structures you build on the territory you stole from them; how you behave towards the Lebanese, or what you have in mind for Iran, we, the signatories on this letter are with you, all the way.”

I am not a citizen of the United States, I am a citizen of a world that is being ruined by Zionism and its practitioners’ thirst for power and greed for land that does not rightly belong to them. Having goaded the United States to attack Iraq, it is now attempting to draw it into a pre-emptive attack on Iran, while continuing to lie about the reason. The Iranian president did not threaten to “Wipe Israel off the map”. 

Juan Cole, a professor of Middle Eastern studies at University of Michigan who reads Persian, has explained that President Ahmadinejad actually stated (quoting the late Ayatollah Khomeini): “The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] from the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad).”

What Israel and the perverse mainstream media has turned this into can be compared to a Farsi speaker saying: “Nothing lasts forever.” And having this turned into, by the likes of the BBC and CNN and the press: “I’m going to kill you.” [Reference: Haaretz]

Treason By Members Of The United States Congress

The Tonka Report Editor’s Note: Wikipedia definition of treason according to the US Constitution– SJH

Article Three of the United States Constitution establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. The judicial branch comprises the Supreme Court of the United States and lower courts as created by Congress.

Section 3: Treason – Section 3 defines treason and its punishment.

Section 3. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

The Constitution defines treason as specific acts, namely “levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” A contrast is therefore maintained with the English law, whereby a variety of crimes, including conspiring to kill the King or “violating” the Queen, were punishable as treason. In Ex Parte Bollman, 8 U.S. 75 (1807), the Supreme Court ruled that “there must be an actual assembling of men, for the treasonable purpose, to constitute a levying of war.”[12]

Under English law effective during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, there were essentially five species of treason.[citation needed] Of the five, the Constitution adopted only two: levying war and adhering to enemies. Omitted were species of treason involving encompassing (or imagining) the death of the king, certain types of counterfeiting, and finally fornication with women in the royal family of the sort which could call into question the parentage of successors. James Wilson wrote the original draft of this section, and he was involved as a defense attorney for some accused of treason against the Patriot cause.

Section 3 also requires the testimony of two different witnesses on the same overt act, or a confession by the accused in open court, to convict for treason. This rule was derived from an older English statute, the Treason Act 1695. In Cramer v. United States, 325 U.S. 1 (1945), the Supreme Court ruled that “[e]very act, movement, deed, and word of the defendant charged to constitute treason must be supported by the testimony of two witnesses.”[13] In Haupt v. United States, 330 U.S. 631 (1947), however, the Supreme Court found that two witnesses are not required to prove intent; nor are two witnesses required to prove that an overt act is treasonable. The two witnesses, according to the decision, are required to prove only that the overt act occurred (eyewitnesses and federal agents investigating the crime, for example).

Punishment for treason may not “work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person” so convicted. The descendants of someone convicted for treason could not, as they were under English law, be considered “tainted” by the treason of their ancestor. Furthermore, Congress may confiscate the property of traitors, but that property must be inheritable at the death of the person convicted.


Link to original post of YouTube video and article below…

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. It appears you are a Jew hater. Israel is the only legimate country in the area. You better wake up dude. Hate crimes!!

    Larry Stanford

    August 22, 2010 at 8:41 pm

  2. Larry Stanford,

    Do you know the difference between the Torah and the Kabbala which is based on the Talmud? Do you know the difference between a Sephardic and Khazar [Ashkenazi] Jew? Do you know where the term “Jew” originated?

    I didn’t think so. The Torah is the text used by real Jews. The Talmud is used by the Zionists.

    Sephardic Jews are from the Tribe of Benjamin in the House of Judah. Khazars [Ashkenazi] are Zionists from the region of Khazaria following the black magic of the Talmud and Kabbala.

    When the House of Judah was taken into captivity by Nebuchednezzer in Babylon, they were called Yehudim, which became the term Jehudim, or Jews (Judahs).

    Meanwhile, the Tribe of Israel was taken into captivity by Assyria (Turkey) and what later consisted of the Khazar empire who were and are the fake Jews [Zionists] of today.

    “…and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.” – Revelation 2:9 KJV

    Jesus Christ, Paul, and all but one of the original twelve Apostles were from the Tribe of Benjamin in the House of Judah. Who wasn’t? Judas Escariot from the Tribe of Dan in the House of Israel.

    The Zionist State of Israel is no more legitimate than Barack Hussein Obama or your pathetic and uneducated comment!

    Have you been to your airport in Denver? Check out the murals and then come back and talk to me about hate crimes, dude! Here’s a sample…

    – SJH

    Steven John Hibbs

    August 22, 2010 at 9:15 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: